### IAM Search

## Proportional -Only Control

Where,

m = Controller output

e = Error (difference between PV and SP)

Kp = Proportional gain

b = Bias

If this equation appears to resemble the standard slope-intercept form of linear equation (y = mx + b), it is more than coincidence. Often, the response of a proportional controller is shown graphically as a line, the slope of the line representing gain and the y-intercept of the line representing the output bias point, or what value the output signal will be when there is zero error (PV precisely equals SP):

In this graph the bias value is 50% and the gain of the controller is 1.

Proportional controllers give us a choice as to how “sensitive” we want the controller to be to changes in process variable (PV) and setpoint (SP). With the simple on/off (“bang-bang”) approach, there was no adjustment. Here, though, we get to program the controller for any desired level of aggressiveness. The gain value (Kp) of a controller is something which may be altered by a technician or engineer. In pneumatic controllers, this takes the form of a lever or valve adjustment; in analog electronic controllers, a potentiometer adjustment; in digital control systems, a programmable parameter.

If the controller could be configured for infinite gain, its response would duplicate on/off control. That is, any amount of error will result in the output signal becoming “saturated” at either 0% or 100%, and the final control element will simply turn on fully when the process variable drops below setpoint and turn off fully when the process variable rises above setpoint. Conversely, if the controller is set for zero gain, it will become completely unresponsive to changes in either process variable or setpoint: the valve will hold its position at the bias point no matter what happens to the process.

Obviously, then, we must set the gain somewhere between infinity and zero in order for this algorithm to function any better than on/off control. Just how much gain a controller needs to have depends on the process and all the other instruments in the control loop.

If the gain is set too high, there will be oscillations as the PV converges on a new setpoint value:

If the gain is set too low, the process response will be stable under steady-state conditions, but “sluggish” to changes in setpoint because the controller does not take aggressive enough action to cause quick changes in the process:

With proportional-only control, the only way to obtain fast-acting response to setpoint changes or “upsets” in the process is to set the gain constant high enough that some “overshoot” results:

As with on/off control, instances of overshoot (the process variable rising above setpoint) and undershoot (drifting below setpoint) are generally undesirable, and for the same reasons. Ideally, the controller will be able to respond in such a way that the process variable is made equal to setpoint as quickly as the process dynamics will allow, yet with no substantial overshoot or undershoot. With plain proportional control, however, this ideal goal is nearly impossible.

An unnecessarily confusing aspect of proportional control is the existence of two completely different ways to express the “aggressiveness” of proportional action. In the proportional-only equation shown earlier, the degree of proportional action was specified by the constant Kp, called gain. However, there is another way to express the sensitivity of proportional action, and that is to state the percentage of error change necessary to make the output (m) change by 100%.

Mathematically, this is the inverse of gain, and it is called proportional band (PB):

Gain is always specified as a unitless value^{1}, whereas proportional band is always specified as a percentage. For example, a gain value of 2.5 is equivalent to a proportional band value of 40%.

Due to the existence of these two completely opposite conventions for specifying proportional action, you may see the proportional term of the control equation written differently depending on whether the author assumes the use of gain or the use of proportional band:

Many modern digital electronic controllers allow the user to conveniently select the unit they wish to use for proportional action. However, even with this ability, anyone tasked with adjusting a controller’s “tuning” values may be required to translate between gain and proportional band, especially if certain values are documented in a way that does not match the unit configured for the controller.

When you communicate the proportional action setting of a process controller, you should always be careful to specify either “gain” or “proportional band” to avoid ambiguity. Never simply say something like, “The proportional setting is twenty,” for this could mean either:

• Gain = 20; Proportional band = 5% . . . or . . .

• Proportional band = 20%; Gain = 5

^{1}In electronics, the unit of decibels is commonly used to express gains. Thankfully, the world of process control was spared the introduction of decibels as a unit of measurement for controller gain. The last thing we need is a third way to express the degree of proportional action in a controller!

**Go Back to Lessons in Instrumentation Table of Contents**

### Related Articles

- Disassembly of a sliding-stem control valve
- Instrumentation Documents - Process and Instrument Diagrams
- Instrumentation Documents - SAMA Diagrams
- Conservation Laws
- Analog Electronic Instrumentation
- Machine Vibration Measurement - Vibration Sensors
- Machine Vibration Measurement - Monitoring Hardware
- Machine Vibration Measurement - Mechanical Vibration Switches
- Signal Characterization
- Doctor Strangeflow, or how I learned to relax and love Reynolds numbers
- Practical Calibration Standards - Temperature Standards
- Practical Calibration Standards - Pressure Standards
- The International System of Units
- Practical Calibration Standards - Flow Standards
- Fluid Mechanics - Torricelli’s Equation
- Fluid Mechanics - Flow Through a Venturi Tube
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Temperature
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Heat
- Industrial Physics Terms and Definitions
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Heat Transfer
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Specific Heat and Enthalpy
- Positive Displacement Flowmeters
- Mathematics for Industrial Instrumentation
- True Mass Flowmeters
- Process/Instrument Suitability of Flowmeters
- Machine Vibration Measurement
- Continuous Analytical Measurement - Safety Gas Analyzers
- Industrial Physics for Industrial Instrumentation
- Metric Prefixes
- Dimensional Analysis for Industrial Physics
- Classical Mechanics
- Elementary Thermodynamics
- Fluid Mechanics
- Chemistry for Instrumentation
- Continuous Analytical Measurement - Conductivity Measurement
- Fluid Mechanics - Pressure
- Fluid Mechanics - Pascal's Principle and Hydrostatic Pressure
- Fluid Mechanics - Manometers
- Fluid Mechanics - Systems of Pressure Measurement
- Fluid Mechanics - Buoyancy
- Fluid Mechanics - Gas Laws
- Fluid Mechanics - Fluid Viscosity
- Fluid Mechanics - Reynolds Number
- Fluid Mechanics - Viscous Flow
- Fluid Mechanics - Bernoulli’s Equation
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Phase Changes
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Phase Diagrams and Critical Points
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Thermodynamic Degrees of Freedom
- Elementary Thermodynamics - Applications of Phase Changes
- Continuous Analytical Measurement - pH Measurement
- Continuous Analytical Measurement - Chromatography
- Continuous Analytical Measurement - Optical Analyses
- Chemistry - Terms and Definitions
- Chemistry - Atomic Theory and Chemical Symbols
- Chemistry - Periodic Table of Elements
- Chemistry - Electronic Structure
- Chemistry - Spectroscopy
- Practical Calibration Standards - Analytical Standards
- Chemistry - Formulae for Common Chemical Compounds
- Chemistry - Molecular Quantities
- Chemistry - Energy in Chemical Reactions
- Chemistry - Periodic Table of the Ions
- Chemistry - Ions in Liquid Solutions
- Chemistry - pH
- Final Control Elements - Control Valves
- Final Control Elements - Variable-Speed Motor Controls
- Principles of Feedback Control
- Basic Feedback Control Principles
- On/Off Control
- Proportional-Only Offset
- Integral (Reset) Control
- Derivative (Rate) Control
- Summary of PID Control Terms
- P, I, and D Responses Graphed
- Different PID Equations
- Pneumatic PID Controllers
- Analog Electronic PID Controllers
- Digital PID Controllers
- Practical PID Controller Features
- Classified Areas and Electrical Safety Measures
- Concepts of Probability and Reliability
- Process Characterization
- Before You Tune...
- Quantitative PID Tuning Procedures
- Tuning Techniques Compared
- Process Safety and Instrumentation
- Notes to Students with Regards to Process Dynamics and PID Controller Tuning
- Basic Process Control Strategies
- Lessons in Instrumentation TOC
- Supervisory Control
- Cascade Control
- Ratio Control
- Relation Control
- Feedforward Control
- Feedforward with Dynamic Compensation
- Limit, Selector, and Override Controls
- Safety Instrumented Functions and Systems
- Instrument System Problem-Solving