Zero and Span Adjustments (Analog Transmitters)

IAM Search

Zero and Span Adjustments (Analog Transmitters)

The purpose of calibration is to ensure the input and output of an instrument correspond to one another predictably throughout the entire range of operation. We may express this expectation in the form of a graph, showing how the input and output of an instrument should relate:

This graph shows how any given percentage of input should correspond to the same percentage of output, all the way from 0% to 100%.

Things become more complicated when the input and output axes are represented by units of measurement other than “percent.” Take for instance a pressure transmitter, a device designed to sense a fluid pressure and output an electronic signal corresponding to that pressure. Here is a graph for a pressure transmitter with an input range of 0 to 100 pounds per square inch (PSI) and an electronic output signal range of 4 to 20 milliamps (mA) electric current:

Although the graph is still linear, zero pressure does not equate to zero current. This is called a live zero, because the 0% point of measurement (0 PSI fluid pressure) corresponds to a non-zero (“live”) electronic signal. 0 PSI pressure may be the LRV (Lower Range Value) of the transmitter’s input, but the LRV of the transmitter’s output is 4 mA, not 0 mA.

Any linear, mathematical function may be expressed in “slope-intercept” equation form:

y = mx + b

Where,

y = Vertical position on graph

x = Horizontal position on graph

m = Slope of line

b = Point of intersection between the line and the vertical (y) axis

This instrument’s calibration is no different. If we let x represent the input pressure in units of PSI and y represent the output current in units of milliamps, we may write an equation for this instrument as follows:

y = 0.16x + 4

On the actual instrument (the pressure transmitter), there are two adjustments which let us match the instrument’s behavior to the ideal equation. One adjustment is called the zero while the other is called the span. These two adjustments correspond exactly to the b and m terms of the linear function, respectively: the “zero” adjustment shifts the instrument’s function vertically on the graph, while the “span” adjustment changes the slope of the function on the graph. By adjusting both zero and span, we may set the instrument for any range of measurement within the manufacturer’s limits.

The relation of the slope-intercept line equation to an instrument’s zero and span adjustments reveals something about how those adjustments are actually achieved in any instrument. A “zero” adjustment is always achieved by adding or subtracting some quantity, just like the y-intercept term b adds or subtracts to the product mx. A “span” adjustment is always achieved by multiplying or dividing some quantity, just like the slope m forms a product with our input variable x.

Zero adjustments typically take one or more of the following forms in an instrument:

• Bias force (spring or mass force applied to a mechanism)

• Mechanical offset (adding or subtracting a certain amount of motion)

• Bias voltage (adding or subtracting a certain amount of potential)

Span adjustments typically take one of these forms:

• Fulcrum position for a lever (changing the force or motion multiplication)

• Amplifier gain (multiplying or dividing a voltage signal)

• Spring rate (changing the force per unit distance of stretch)

It should be noted that for most analog instruments, zero and span adjustments are interactive. That is, adjusting one has an effect on the other. Specifically, changes made to the span adjustment almost always alter the instrument’s zero point1. An instrument with interactive zero and span adjustments requires much more effort to accurately calibrate, as one must switch back and forth between the lower- and upper-range points repeatedly to adjust for accuracy.

1It is actually quite rare to find an instrument where a change to the zero adjustment affects the instrument’s span.

Click here to go to the next page, Damping Adjustments

Click here to go back to the first part of the Instrument Calibration Series, Calibration versus Re-ranging

Go Back to Lessons in Instrumentation Table of Contents

Comments (1) Add Comment