Instrumentation Documents - Loop Diagrams
Note that dashed lines now represent individual copper wires instead of whole cables. Terminal blocks where these wires connect to are represented by squares with numbers in them. Cable numbers, wire colors, junction block numbers, panel identification, and even grounding points are all shown in loop diagrams. The only type of diagram at a lower level of abstraction than a loop diagram would be an electronic schematic diagram for an individual instrument, which of course would only show details pertaining to that one instrument. Thus, the loop diagram is the most detailed form of diagram for a control system as a whole, and thus it must contain all details omitted by PFDs and P&IDs alike.
To the novice it may seem excessive to include such trivia as wire colors in a loop diagram. To the experienced instrument technician who has had to work on systems lacking such documented detail, this information is highly valued. The more detail you put into a loop diagram, the easier it makes the inevitable job of maintaining that system at some later date. When a loop diagram shows you exactly what wire color to expect at exactly what point in an instrumentation system, and exactly what terminal that wire should connect to, it becomes much easier to proceed with any troubleshooting, calibration, or upgrade task.
An interesting detail seen on this loop diagram is an entry specifying “input calibration” and “output calibration” for each and every instrument in the system. This is actually a very important concept to keep in mind when troubleshooting a complex instrumentation system: every instrument has at least one input and at least one output, with some sort of mathematical relationship between the two. Diagnosing where a problem lies within a measurement or control system often reduces to testing various instruments to see if their output responses appropriately match their input conditions.
For example, one way to test the flow transmitter in this system would be to subject it to a number of different pressures within its range (specified in the diagram as 0 to 100 inches of water column differential) and seeing whether or not the current signal output by the transmitter was consistently proportional to the applied pressure (e.g. 4 mA at 0 inches pressure, 20 mA at 100 inches pressure, 12 mA at 50 inches pressure, etc.).
Given the fact that a calibration error or malfunction in any one of these instruments can cause a problem for the control system as a whole, it is nice to know there is a way to determine which instrument is to blame and which instruments are not. This general principle holds true regardless of the instrument’s type or technology. You can use the same input-versus-output test procedure to verify the proper operation of a pneumatic (3 to 15 PSI) level transmitter or an analog electronic (4 to 20 mA) flow transmitter or a digital (fieldbus) temperature transmitter alike. Each and every instrument has an input and an output, and there is always a predictable (and testable) correlation from one to the other.
Another interesting detail seen on this loop diagram is the action of each instrument. You will notice a box and arrow (pointing either up or down) next to each instrument bubble. An “up” arrow (↑) represents a direct-acting instrument: one whose output signal increases as the input stimulus increases. A “down” arrow (↓) represents a reverse-acting instrument: one whose output signal decreases as the input stimulus increases. All the instruments in this loop are direct-acting with the exception of the pressure differential transmitter PDT-42:
Here, the “down” arrow tells us the transmitter will output a full-range signal (20 mA) when it senses zero differential pressure, and a 0% signal (4 mA) when sensing a full 200 PSI differential. While this calibration may seem confusing and unwarranted, it serves a definite purpose in this particular control system. Since the transmitter’s current signal decreases as pressure increases, and the controller must be correspondingly configured, a decreasing current signal will be interpreted by the controller as a high differential pressure. If any wire connection fails in the 4-20 mA current loop for that transmitter, the resulting 0 mA signal will be naturally “seen” by the controller as a pressure over-range condition. This is considered dangerous in a compressor system because it predicts a condition of surge. Thus, the controller will naturally take action to prevent surge by commanding the anti-surge control valve to open, because it “thinks” the compressor is about to surge. In other words, the transmitter is intentionally calibrated to be reverse-acting such that any break in the signal wiring will naturally bring the system to its safest condition.
written by David, April 17, 2012
- Learn Ladder Logic with a Free Version of RSLogix 500 and RSEmulator 500
- A Quick Tutorial on RSLogix Emulator 5000
- What Are Those IP Codes Found On The Instrument Enclosures?
- Electrical / Instrumentation Engineer for Nestle Philippines
- What are the Process Variables?
- What are the primary elements used for flow measurement ?
- Cotabato Sugar Central Co., Inc. - Various Jobs for immediate hiring
- Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID) Symbols
- Calibration Basics!
- Drives 101: Adjustable / Variable Frequency Drives
- Basic DC Electricity for Industrial Instrumentation
- Predicting the Maximum Input and Output Times for CIP Connections
- Determining System Bandwidth Requirements
- AC Electricity : Transmission Lines
- Introduction to Industrial Instrumentation
- Example: Boiler Water Level Control System
- Example: Wastewater Disinfection
- Example: chemical reactor temperature control
- Other Types of Instruments
- Instrumentation Documents
- Instrument Connections
- Discrete Process Measurement - Level Switches
- Discrete Process Measurement - Temperature Switches
- Instrumentation Documents - Process and Instrument Diagrams
- Instrumentation Documents - Process Flow Diagrams
- Instrumentation Documents - SAMA Diagrams
- Instrumentation Documents - Instrument and Process Equipment Symbols
- Instrumentation Documents - Instrumentation Identification Tags
- Discrete Process Measurement - Hand Switches
- Discrete Process Measurement - Limit Switches
- Discrete Process Measurement - Proximity Switches
- Discrete Process Measurement - Pressure Switches
- Programmable Logic Controllers
- Discrete Control Elements - On/Off Electric Motor Control Circuits
- PLC Logic Programming Part 1
- PLC Logic Programming Part 2
- PLC Logic Programming Part 3
- Analog Electronic Instrumentation
- How To Teach Yourself PLC Programming
- PLC Input/Output (I/O) Capabilities
- Monitoring and Modifying Data Views and Tag Values Using an EtherNet/IP Web Server Module
- Accessing a Data View
- Creating a Data View in an EtherNet/IP Web Server Module
- Heat Exchanger Design
- Digital Data Communication Theory
- Analog Electronics Instrumentation - Current Loops
- Troubleshooting Current Loops
- Introduction - Digital Data Acquisition and Networks
- Configuring Device Parameters
- EIA/TIA-232, 422, and 485 Networks
- Displaying Hardware
- Ethernet Networks
- Internet Protocol (IP)
- Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
- The HART Digital/Analog Hybrid Standard
- Introduction to SPEEDTRONIC Mark VI
- Accessing Diagnostic Information about an EtherNet/IP Network Using a Web Server Module
- Sending Email Using a Web Server Module
- Managing User Accounts and Access Levels for an EtherNet/IP Web Server Module
- Configuring an EtherNet/IP Web Server Module
- Automation Test and Training Rig: The Making
- SPEEDTRONIC Mark VI Hardware Description
- SPEEDTRONIC Mark VI Control Software Philosophy
- SPEEDTRONIC Mark VI Protection Systems
- INDUSTRIAL CONTROL HANDBOOK - 0.1 AUTOMATE, EMIGRATE, LEGISLATE, OR EVAPORATE